The important thing to remember when gathering evidence is that the more evidence the better - that is, the more evidence you gather to demonstrate your skills, the more confident an assessor can be that you have learned the skills not just at one point in time, but are continuing to apply and develop those skills (as opposed to just learning for the test!). Furthermore, one piece of evidence that you collect will not usualy demonstrate all the required criteria for a unit of competency, whereas multiple overlapping pieces of evidence will usually do the trick!
From the Wiki University
What evidence can you provide to prove your understanding of each of the following citeria?
Define the basis for using Training Package/s and accredited courses
|
|
Discussions are held with relevant persons to confirm training and/or assessment needs of the client Completed |
Evidence:
|
Training Packages and/or accredited courses which could satisfy client needs are identified and sourced Completed |
Evidence:
|
Endorsed components of the Training Package/s and/or accredited courses are explored to determine whether client needs are addressed Completed |
Evidence:
|
Additional sources of information are identified to clarify Training Package and/or accredited courses content and requirements, where necessary Completed |
Evidence:
|
The specific purpose and application/s of using Training Packages and/or accredited courses are confirmed with relevant persons Completed |
Evidence:
|
Analyse and interpret the qualifications framework
|
|
The qualifications framework of the selected Training Packages and/or accredited courses, including the packaging rules, is read and interpreted accurately Completed |
Evidence:
|
Advice is sought from experts and others where guidance on interpretation is needed Completed |
Evidence:
|
The qualifications framework is applied to meet client needs, where appropriate Completed |
Evidence:
|
Analyse and interpret competency standards and accredited modules for client application/s
|
|
Individual competency standards are selected to meet client needs in accordance with any packaging rules and co-relationships between units Completed |
Evidence:
|
All parts of the competency standard and/or accredited modules format and structure are read, analysed and interpreted for meaning Completed |
Evidence:
|
All parts of the competency standard and/or accredited modules are analysed for English language, literacy and numeracy requirements Completed |
Evidence:
|
The selected competency standards and/or accredited modules are analysed to identify the dimensions of competency Completed |
Evidence:
|
The relationships between the parts of the competency standard are identified and the whole competency standard is used in the application to meet client needs Completed |
Evidence:
|
The relationship between parts of modules are identified and the whole module is used in the application to meet client needs Completed |
Evidence:
|
Content links between competency standards and/or accredited modules are analysed to develop effective applications for the client Completed |
Evidence:
|
Advice is sought from experts where guidance on interpretation is needed Completed |
Evidence:
|
Analysis and interpretation of competency standards and/or accredited modules is documented Completed |
Evidence:
|
Contextualise competency standards and accredited courses for client application/s
|
|
Clarification is sought from the client regarding the need for contextualisation of competency standards or accredited courses Completed |
Evidence:
|
If required, competency standards or accredited courses are contextualised using the relevant Training Package's or curricula guidelines/advice on contextualisation Completed |
Evidence:
|
Feedback is sought from experts to ensure contextualisation meets the competency standards and the Training Package's or accredited courses contextualisation advice Completed |
Evidence:
|
Analyse and interpret assessment guidance for client application
|
|
All sections of the Assessment Guidelines of the Training Package/s and/or accredited courses are read, interpreted and applied to the application Completed |
Evidence:
|
Where two or more Training Packages and/or accredited courses are used to meet client needs, the assessment guidelines of each Training Package and/or curricula are applied Completed |
Evidence:
|
Advice is sought from experts where guidance on interpretation is needed Completed |
Evidence:
|
Use Training Package/s and accredited courses as an integrated tool for client application
|
|
All analysis and interpretation of Training Package and/or accredited courses content is reviewed against the purpose and the application to meet client needs Completed |
Evidence:
|
All analysis and interpretation of Training Package and/or accredited courses content is reviewed against requirements and guidelines Completed |
Evidence:
|
The interrelationships in content between the three endorsed components of the Training Package are evident in the application or in the case of accredited courses, the relationship between component parts Completed |
Evidence:
|
The user of the Training Package and/or accredited courses reflects on the process and continuous improvements for other applications Completed |
Evidence:
|